The reality, as you know, back in the beginnings of some of the online programs, the provost office stood up, Institute for Distributed... Distance and Distributed Learning, IDDL. And IDDL was part of the provost office, but they were set up and in fact funded out of revenue from distance learning programs like Master of Information Technology. But that wasn't the only program. And then faculty were wanting to do things like flip classroom or limited sorts of distance learning capabilities as part of the class. And IDDL had the expertise to do that, but they didn't have the funding to do it. They were generating their livelihoods, most of them on restricted positions. There's a certain business model for like the Master of Information Technology program where everything that goes into it sort of accounted for, and then there's revenue out of it. And that revenue out of it goes to pay things like the instructors and the program support. But also it was paying IDDL and IDDL did some things that I would say were program level - How do you organize these programs? And it did some things that are more faculty-facing. How do we develop your course? How do we design and implement your course to be effective as a distance learning course? Those faculty-facing elements of IDDL, not the program elements but the faculty-facing elements came in to TLOS. And so then we had sort of this one place that sort of dealt with the technology, the training, our on site sort of connected classrooms as well as this distance learning instructional design and things like that. Yeah, that was very much a collaborative effort between IT and the provost office.